Bridge Analysis Gone Wrong

Pages: Page 2 of 5

Dealer: East
Vuln: N-S
Scoring: Pairs
  1. spadeA K Q 7 5
  2. heartJ 4
  3. diamond10 4
  4. clubJ 8 7 3
  1. spade10 9
  2. heart3 2
  3. diamondA Q 7 2
  4. clubK Q 9 4 2
club diamond heart spade NT
N - - 4 4 2
S - - 4 4 2
E 1 1 - - -
W 1 1 - - -
Green square in centre
  1. spadeJ 8 6
  2. heart10 8 6
  3. diamondJ 8 6 3
  4. clubA 6 5

Contract: 4heart
Declarer: South
Lead: clubK
  1. spade4 3 2
  2. heartA K Q 9 7 5
  3. diamondK 9 5
  4. club10
Double dummy analyser: makeable contracts
West North East South
Pass 1heart
Pass 1spade Pass 2heart
Pass 3heart Pass 4heart
Pass Pass Pass
The commentary in the booklet said that North-South have a game available in either major. East-West could consider a sacrifice in the minors but only the one in diamonds would be profitable because a club contract suffers from an extra loser. I suppose that West might come in at this vulnerabily with Pairs scoring so let's imagine he likes the sound of his own voice and/or has super confidence in his and his partner's declarer play.

Mmmm. What do you think?
Previous page Next page

This section is a placeholder for the forum. For the time being it will be a noshow class.