|
Dealer: North |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contract: 4 |
Double dummy analyser: makeable contracts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pass | 1 |
3 |
|
| Pass | 3NT | Pass | 4 |
| Pass | Pass | Pass | |
|
* pre-emptive
|
|||
Without Q, and seeing the threat of dummy's diamonds, it would look much more attractive to East to cash
A first before playing a third spade - from his point of view where else could the setting trick possibly come from? The "mercurial" East's failure to cash
A means that South is almost invited declarer to pitch a club loser on the spade continuation - and that's why South should not! South needs the diamond finesse anyway - so why not rely on the suit for four tricks?
Previous page