|
Dealer: East |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contract: 7 |
Double dummy analyser: makeable contracts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pass | 1 |
||
| 1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Pass | 3 |
Pass | 4 |
| Pass | 5 |
Pass | 5 |
| Pass | 5NT | Pass | 6 |
| Pass | 7 |
End |
At the table declarer played a spade to hand at trick two. Now tell me honestly, did I lie about North still retaining his club options with this line. I think not, but they're not much use when you're already at least one off!
I wonder why West hadn't doubled the final contract for a club lead in the first place? In the other room North-South stayed in 6, doubled by West. East led a club and the spade return put declarer down here too.
Previous page