Apportion the Blame

Dealer: South
Vuln: N-S
Scoring: Aggregate

  1. spadeA 4 2
  2. heartA 9 7 3
  3. diamondA
  4. club9 8 6 5 3
  1. spadeQ J 10 9 3
  2. heart10 4
  3. diamond6
  4. clubA Q 10 4 2
club diamond heart spade NT
N 1 - 6 - 3
S 1 - 6 - 3
E - - - 2 -
W - - - 2 -
Green square in centre
  1. spade8 7 6
  2. heart5
  3. diamondK 9 8 7 5 4 3
  4. clubK J

Contract: 6heartx
Declarer: South
Lead: spadeQ

  1. spadeK 5
  2. heartK Q J 8 6 2
  3. diamondQ J 10 2
  4. club7
Double dummy analyser: makeable contracts
West North East South
1heart
1spade 4heart* 4spade 5heart
5spade 6heart Dble Pass
Pass Pass

* ugh!

Cross to dummy's diamondA and ruff a club. When East's jack appears you might suspect that he is short in clubs, a suspicion strongly reinforced when West shows out on the second round of diamonds. The way is now clear for a cross-ruff, South entering his hand three times in order to ruff his losing diamonds.

At the table South simply drew trumps at trick two and relied on the ruffing diamond finesse, so the match was lost. Had North doubled 5spade or South made 6heart then the result would have been reversed. Who would you have blamed?
Previous page

This section is a placeholder for the forum. For the time being it will be a noshow class.