|
Dealer: South |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contract: 4 |
Double dummy analyser: makeable contracts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
|||
| Pass | Pass | Dble | Pass |
| Pass | Pass |
Of course East should switch to K at trick two or three to remove dummy's entry. West's
2 surely cannot show three - that would give him seven diamonds and he would have removed 4
doubled to 5
. This defence could only be wrong if South has
Q10 and West
10, when a spade continuation would promote a trump trick
At the other table..
Previous page Next page