|
Dealer: North |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contract: 3NT |
Double dummy analyser: makeable contracts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Pass | 1 |
|
| Pass | 2 |
Pass | 2 |
| Pass | 3 |
Pass | 3NT |
| Pass | Pass | Pass |
At the table declarer adopted the first alternative and went down. East's diabolical 6 threw South from the winning line of
K, back to
A to cash two more diamonds, the last of which squeezes East in the black suits. East did well, for to discard a spade at trick four would be less misleading for declarer.
Incidentally, if I had closed my eyes and rebid 1NT then we would probably still have reached this foul contract, but East would have been left with a horrible lead.
Previous page