Lousy Bidding Lousy Contract

Dealer: North
Vuln: N-S
Scoring: IMPs

  1. spadeQ 6
  2. heart7 6 3
  3. diamondK 10 4
  4. clubA K Q 10 5
  1. spade9 7 3 2
  2. heartK J 9 4
  3. diamond9 8 2
  4. club8 4
club diamond heart spade NT
N 3 3 1 2 2
S 3 3 1 2 2
E - - - - -
W - - - - -
Green square in centre
  1. spadeK J 5
  2. heartA Q 2
  3. diamondQ 6 3
  4. clubJ 9 7 2

Contract: 3NT
Declarer: South
Lead: heart4

  1. spadeA 10 8 4
  2. heart10 8 5
  3. diamondA J 7 5
  4. club6 3
Double dummy analyser: makeable contracts
West North East South
1club Pass 1diamond
Pass 2diamond Pass 2spade
Pass 3heart Pass 3NT
Pass Pass Pass
You'll need to seeing through the backs of the cards to get this one right. After losing the firest four tricks you decide to play low from dummy and East's spadeJ forces your ace. The choices are now
a) cash clubs, hoping that clubJ comes down and leaving you to find diamondQ with a finesse or / squeeze
b) find diamondQ immediately and cash four diamonds hoping for a favourable club position or a black suit squeeze.

At the table declarer adopted the first alternative and went down. East's diabolical diamond6 threw South from the winning line of diamondK, back to diamondA to cash two more diamonds, the last of which squeezes East in the black suits. East did well, for to discard a spade at trick four would be less misleading for declarer.

Incidentally, if I had closed my eyes and rebid 1NT then we would probably still have reached this foul contract, but East would have been left with a horrible lead.
Previous page

This section is a placeholder for the forum. For the time being it will be a noshow class.