|
Dealer: West |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract: 3NTT |
|
|
| West | North | East | South |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pass | 1 |
1NT | Dble |
| 2 |
Pass | 2 |
Pass |
| Pass | 3 |
Pass | 3NT |
| Pass | Pass | Pass# | |
|
*spades, 9-14
|
|||
How might declarer have done better, despite best defence? Well the actual analysis is quite complicated, but if declarer had discarded a heart on the opening lead rather than a diamond, the defence suggested at the table would not have worked. Say declarer wins the lead, and plays clubs as before. If East end-plays herself by winning the third club, it is not good enough to exit with the K because declarer ducks! Whatever East plays then allows access to the South hand. Exiting with a low spade is also of no use for the same reason. If East had made a slight change to her actual defence, the contract is defeated whatever declarer does. East wins the second round of clubs, cashes two top hearts, and then exits with a club. Dummy must now concede two spades tricks, while declarer is still isolated from hand. Result: 3NT-1.
Previous page